翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Law School Democrats of America ・ Law school in the United States ・ Law school of Beirut ・ Law School of Fluminense Federal University ・ Law School of Sorocaba ・ Law School of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki ・ Law school rankings in the United States ・ Law School Transparency ・ Law schools in South Korea ・ Law Siu On ・ Law society ・ Law Society (horse) ・ Law Society Gazette ・ Law Society of Alberta ・ Law Society of British Columbia ・ Law Society of British Columbia v Mangat ・ Law Society of England and Wales ・ Law Society of Hong Kong ・ Law Society of Ireland ・ Law Society of Kenya ・ Law Society of Manitoba ・ Law Society of New Brunswick v Ryan ・ Law Society of New South Wales ・ Law Society of Northern Ireland ・ Law Society of Scotland ・ Law Society of Singapore ・ Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope v Windvogel ・ Law Society of Upper Canada Archives ・ Law Society of Upper Canada v Skapinker ・ Law Song Seng Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Law Society of British Columbia v Mangat ： ウィキペディア英語版 Law Society of British Columbia v Mangat ''Law Society of British Columbia v Mangat'', () 3 S.C.R. 113 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court held that a non-lawyer may be given the power to practice law under a federal statute even if it is contrary to a provincial legal profession legislation. ==Background== The respondent M was an immigration consultant carrying on his work through an immigration consulting company (“Westcoast”). He had not studied law in Canada and was not a member of the B.C. Law Society. M and other Westcoast employees engaged in a number of activities involving immigration proceedings, including appearing as counsel or advocate on behalf of aliens, for or in the expectation of a fee from the persons for whom the acts were performed, before the Immigration and Refugee Board (“IRB”). The Law Society brought an application seeking a permanent injunction against M and Westcoast to prevent them from engaging in the ongoing practice of law, in contravention of the B.C. Legal Profession Act. M and Westcoast admitted that they were engaged in the practice of law within the meaning of s. 1 of the Legal Profession Act, but contended that their conduct was sanctioned by ss. 30 and 69(1) of the Immigration Act, which permit non-lawyers to appear on behalf of clients before the IRB. The judge issued the injunction on the grounds that ss. 30 and 69(1) of the Immigration Act did not authorize the practice of law. Alternatively, she would have granted the injunction on the basis that the provisions were ultra vires Parliament. The Court of Appeal set aside the injunction. The central issues raised by this appeal are whether ss. 30 and 69(1) of the Immigration Act are intra vires Parliament, and whether s. 26 of the Legal Profession Act, which prohibits a person, other than a member of the Law Society in good standing or a person listed in the exceptions, to engage in the practice of law, is constitutionally inoperative to persons acting under ss. 30 and 69(1) of the Immigration Act and its associated Rules and Regulations. In this Court, the respondent S was added to the proceedings on the basis that she is an immigration consultant and was engaged in the same activities as M, given that M became a member of the Alberta Law Society soon after leave to appeal was granted by this Court. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Law Society of British Columbia v Mangat」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.